BillCarmichael

 

* Home     * About     * Archives     * Guestbook     * Contacts     * Subscribe



* Themes
     Today's thought





Don't try this in Sheffield!

David Blunkett has so far enjoyed an incredibly easy ride - if you’ll excuse the phrase given the circumstances - following revelations that he conducted an illicit affair, possibly fathering two children as a result.
When Children’s Minister Margaret Hodge announced recently that the government was determined to “intrude” on all areas of family life, perhaps having government ministers popping around personally to impregnate married women wasn’t exactly what she had in mind.
But across the political spectrum the reaction has been one of support and even sympathy for the beleaguered home secretary.
The contrast with the days of “Tory Sleaze” couldn’t be sharper. If a Conservative home secretary had been found with his trousers around his ankles, do you think media commentators would be lining up to pat him on the back? No, I don’t think so either.
I’ve lost count of the number people over recent days who have told me that because Blunkett is single and unattached he is entirely blameless in this affair.
At the risk of sounding old fashioned I’m afraid I can’t agree. Even if he is cleared of charges of misusing his position – and he is far from out of the woods yet - he was still an active participant in a despicable betrayal of a man who had done him absolutely no harm.
When Blunkett shook hands with his lover’s unsuspecting husband at some Spectator soiree did he not feel a twinge of guilt, shame, remorse or at the very least embarrassment. Apparently not.
Incidentally, what are they putting in the canapés at Spectator parties – Viagra?
If you have any sympathy to spare I suggest you reserve not for Blunkett - who is perfectly capably of looking after himself - but for the cuckolded husband and the entirely blameless children who are going to have to pick up the pieces from this sordid business.
In one way this story merely illustrates how far Blunkett has drifted away from his Yorkshire roots.
Bedding a friend’s wife and getting her pregnant - twice - doesn’t turn a hair in the salons of South Kensington. For all I know it’s probably obligatory.
But if Blunkett tried such funny business in the working men’s clubs of his native city he’d very quickly find himself on the end of a well-deserved pasting from the aggrieved husband.
My advice? Don’t try it in Sheffield, David.
1.12.04 22:18


Spot the difference

Christmas is almost upon us and clipboard men up and down the country have begun their traditional Yuletide chorus: “You can’t do that mate, it’s more than my jobsworth!”


In Castleford members of the local choral society were banned from the Carlton Lanes shopping centre where they have held a carol concert for more than ten years because clipboard man suddenly decided the singers constituted a fire hazard.


Not to be outdone the TUC and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents say mistletoe and balloons should be banned in case of sexual harassment suits and compensation claims from people with a latex allergy.


Meanwhile, clipboard men across the land have taken up the campaign to ban Christmas “in case it offends Muslims” with undisguised glee.


In Birmingham – the city that re-named Christmas ‘Winterval’ – Father Christmas has been banned from the Bullring shopping centre “in case it offends Muslims”.


In Luton council bosses renamed their Christmas lights “Luminos” in order “to avoid upsetting Muslims”.


The Red Cross meanwhile has banned all mention of Christmas from its stores in case – yes, you guessed it –  “it offends Muslims”.


Not to be left behind in this collective rush to madness, Liberal Demagogue councillors in Islington, north London have demanded the word “saint” be dropped from the name of St Mary Magdalene C of E school “in case it offends Muslims”.


In High Wycombe the library banned posters advertising a carol concert “in case it offends Muslims”, although it was happy to host a party to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Fitr.


In Tower Hamlets in London council workers have been told they can only hold a Christmas party if they re-name it a “Festive Lunch” to “avoid upsetting Muslims”.


To cap it all David Blunkett, the UK’s Clipboard Man In Chief, is pushing through an illiberal law that would prosecute people for telling jokes about religion “in case it offends Muslims”.


I might be missing something here but has anyone ever produced a single example of a Muslim offended by Christmas?


Islam reveres Jesus Christ as a prophet, so it is hugely unlikely that any reasonable Muslim would object to a festival celebrating his birth.


In truth all this has absolutely nothing to do with Muslims – they are merely used as a convenient excuse by a liberal-left establishment consumed by guilt and self-loathing.


This self-serving elite acts like an alien occupying force, determined to destroy our indigenous culture and replace it with a grim, humourless, politically correct homogeneity.


But it is easy to join the resistance – all you have to do is celebrate and enjoy this great Christian festival just as the inhabitants of these islands have done for many hundreds of years.


Happy Christmas!


 

3.12.04 16:44


They'd be apathetic but they can't be bothered

A coalition of Canadian anti-war protestors, left-wing lawyers and anti-capitalists promised a huge demonstration in protest at US President’s George Bush’s visit to Ottawa last week.


There were even dark threats that the protests could turn violent and many groups openly pressed for shows of ‘direct action’. I’m not entirely sure what that is, but I think we all seen enough of these protests to make a shrewd guess.


Police were mobilised, hospitals put on alert and multi-national chain stores such as McDonald’s boarded up their shop fronts in the city.


In the event the demonstration attracted a grand total - and I’m not making this up - of 39 determined class warriors.


They were outnumbered by the 42 journalists sent to cover the event. I’m not sure who was more embarrassed by this, but when it came to conducting interviews the hacks found there weren’t enough Bush haters to go around.


Are we witnessing the first revolution in history to fail because the would-be rebels are so incredibly spoilt and pampered that they just can’t even be bothered to get off their backsides?


Imagine if the present day lefties had been around during the big revolutionary moments of the past?


“ Hey, Vladimir Ilyich, we’re off to storm the Winter Palace. Fancy coming?”fficeffice" />


“Nah, I’ve got a couple of tunes to download to my iPod and I want to watch I’m a Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here.”

8.12.04 18:25


Adams' slip of the tongue

Gerry Adams says the IRA will never accept the “humiliation” of providing photographic evidence of the destruction of its cache of guns and bombs.


How the hell does he know?


Since he swapped the black balaclava for a smart business suit in recent years the Republican leader has been insistent that the IRA and Sinn Fein are two entirely separate entities.


So how is it that he now professes familiarity with the innermost thoughts of the IRA high command?


Surely Adams isn’t suggesting that the terrorist thugs of the IRA and the “democratic” politicians of Sinn Fein are somehow inextricably linked - or indeed are one and the same?


Of course Adams’ slip of the tongue goes right to the heart of the problem in Northern Ireland.


IRA/Sinn Fein demands all the benefits - including vast amounts of British taxpayers’ money - that accrue with taking part in the democratic process.


But it also wants to keep in reserve a private army of well-armed gangster mercenaries just in case the votes don’t go the way it wants.


The time is long overdue for this organisation to decide once and for all whether it wants to wage war or finally follow the path of peace.


There might have been reason for nuance and fudge to kick start the peace process in the first place. But now the choice is simple and straightforward.


As for the genuine democrats in Northern Ireland, Ian Paisley is absolutely right. They shouldn’t be forced - at the point of a gun - to sit alongside ruthless killers in government.


 fficeffice" />

9.12.04 20:14


Good news from Afghanistan

Just over three years ago Afghanistan was mired in such depraved mediaeval barbarity that a woman could have acid thrown in her face simply for failing to wear the burqa.

Today the country has conducted a successful election, boasts a democratically chosen president and children - including girls - can go to school unmolested.

It is a remarkable turn around in such a short time and although the country faces huge problems it at least gives hope for the future.

If the seed of freedom can germinate in Afghanistan, then there is no reason why it can’t flourish in Iraq, Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia.

It would also be one in the eye for those racists who argue that Muslim people are too primitive and backward to cope with free and democratic institutions.

We are witnessing a tremendous democratic experiment in the Middle East that, if successful in Afghanistan and Iraq, could change our world fundamentally for the better.

All lovers of freedom must wish the Iraqi people well when they have the chance - for the first time in their history - to choose their government in elections next month.
10.12.04 15:56


Don't let them steal Christmas

Christmas is almost upon us and clipboard men up and down the country have begun their traditional Yuletide chorus: “You can’t do that mate, it’s more than my jobsworth!”fficeffice" />


In Castleford members of the local choral society were banned from the Carlton Lanes shopping centre where they have held a carol concert for more than ten years because clipboard man suddenly decided the singers constituted a fire hazard.


Not to be outdone the TUC and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents say mistletoe and balloons should be banned in case of sexual harassment suits and compensation claims from people with a latex allergy.


Meanwhile, clipboard men across the land have taken up the campaign to ban Christmas “in case it offends Muslims” with undisguised glee.


In Birmingham – the city that re-named Christmas ‘Winterval’ – Father Christmas has been banned from the Bullring shopping centre “in case it offends Muslims”.


In Luton council bosses renamed their Christmas lights “Luminos” in order “to avoid upsetting Muslims”.


The Red Cross meanwhile has banned all mention of Christmas from its stores in case – yes, you guessed it –  “it offends Muslims”.


Not to be left behind in this collective rush to madness, Liberal Demagogue councillors in Islington, north London have demanded the word “saint” be dropped from the name of St Mary Magdalene C of E school “in case it offends Muslims”.


In High Wycombe the library banned posters advertising a carol concert “in case it offends Muslims”, although it was happy to host a party to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Fitr.


In Tower Hamlets in London council workers have been told they can only hold a Christmas party if they re-name it a “Festive Lunch” to “avoid upsetting Muslims”.


To cap it all David Blunkett, the UK’s now-departed Clipboard Man In Chief, is pushing through an illiberal law that would prosecute people for telling jokes about religion “in case it offends Muslims”.


I might be missing something here but has anyone ever produced a single example of a Muslim offended by Christmas?


Islam reveres Jesus Christ as a prophet, so it is hugely unlikely that any reasonable Muslim would object to a festival celebrating his birth.


In truth all this has absolutely nothing to do with Muslims – they are merely used as a convenient excuse by a liberal-left establishment consumed by guilt and self-loathing.


This self-serving elite acts like an alien occupying force, determined to destroy our indigenous culture and replace it with a grim, humourless, politically correct homogeneity.


But it is easy to join the resistance – all you have to do is celebrate and enjoy this great Christian festival just as the inhabitants of these islands have done for many hundreds of years.


Happy Christmas!


 

17.12.04 16:22


Don't let them steal Christmas!

Christmas is almost upon us and clipboard men up and down the country have begun their traditional Yuletide chorus: “You can’t do that mate, it’s more than my jobsworth!”


In Castleford members of the local choral society were banned from the Carlton Lanes shopping centre where they have held a carol concert for more than ten years because clipboard man suddenly decided the singers constituted a fire hazard.


Not to be outdone the TUC and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents say mistletoe and balloons should be banned in case of sexual harassment suits and compensation claims from people with a latex allergy.


Meanwhile, clipboard men across the land have taken up the campaign to ban Christmas “in case it offends Muslims” with undisguised glee.


In Birmingham – the city that re-named Christmas ‘Winterval’ – Father Christmas has been banned from the Bullring shopping centre “in case it offends Muslims”.


In Luton council bosses renamed their Christmas lights “Luminos” in order “to avoid upsetting Muslims”.


The Red Cross meanwhile has banned all mention of Christmas from its stores in case – yes, you guessed it –  “it offends Muslims”.


Not to be left behind in this collective rush to madness, Liberal Demagogue councillors in Islington, north London have demanded the word “saint” be dropped from the name of St Mary Magdalene C of E school “in case it offends Muslims”.


In High Wycombe the library banned posters advertising a carol concert “in case it offends Muslims”, although it was happy to host a party to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Fitr.


In Tower Hamlets in London council workers have been told they can only hold a Christmas party if they re-name it a “Festive Lunch” to “avoid upsetting Muslims”.


To cap it all David Blunkett, the UK’s Clipboard Man In Chief, is pushing through an illiberal law that would prosecute people for telling jokes about religion “in case it offends Muslims”.


I might be missing something here but has anyone ever produced a single example of a Muslim offended by Christmas?


Islam reveres Jesus Christ as a prophet, so it is hugely unlikely that any reasonable Muslim would object to a festival celebrating his birth.


In truth all this has absolutely nothing to do with Muslims – they are merely used as a convenient excuse by a liberal-left establishment consumed by guilt and self-loathing.


This self-serving elite acts like an alien occupying force, determined to destroy our indigenous culture and replace it with a grim, humourless, politically correct homogeneity.


But it is easy to join the resistance – all you have to do is celebrate and enjoy this great Christian festival just as the inhabitants of these islands have done for many hundreds of years.


Happy Christmas!

17.12.04 16:30


 [next page]



The weblog's authors are responsible for the contents of this blog. Your free weblog from 20six.co.uk